Data Quality Analysis on Open Government Data Portals: A Qualitative Study Using ISO/IEC 25012:2008 Standards
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.862Keywords:
Data Quality, OGD Portal, Data Completeness, ISO/IEC 25012:2008Abstract
This study evaluates the data quality on Open Government Data (OGD) portals using the ISO/IEC 25012:2008 standard, which categorizes data quality into two main groups: inherent data quality and system-dependent data quality. This standard encompasses dimensions such as accuracy, completeness, consistency, and relevance. Using a qualitative approach, interviews were conducted with data providers and users from the government, industry, and academia. The findings indicate that while some datasets are adequate, there are issues with semantic consistency, completeness, timeliness, and currency of the data. These findings highlight the importance of strict and continuous application of data quality standards in OGD management. Recommendations for improvement include training for data managers and enhancing validation mechanisms before data is published. This study supports government efforts to improve transparency and accountability by providing high-quality data that can be reliably used by various stakeholders.
Downloads
References
A. Vetrò, L. Canova, M. Torchiano, C. O. Minotas, R. Iemma, and F. Morando, “Open Data Quality Measurement Framework: Definition and application to open government data,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 325–337, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.001.
J. Merino, I. Caballero, B. Rivas, & Serrano, M., and M. Piattini, “A data quality in use model for big data,” Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 63, pp. 123–130, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.future.2015.11.024.
M. Janssen, P. Brous, E. Estevez, L. S. Barbosa, and T. Janowski, “Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493.
M. A. A. Alryalat, N. P. Rana, G. P. Sahu, Y. K. Dwivedi, and M. Tajvidi, “Use of social media in citizen-centric electronic government services: A literature analysis,” Crowdsourcing Concepts, Methodol. Tools, Appl., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 925–977, 2019, doi: 10.4018/IJEGR.2017070104.
M. Beno, K. Figl, J. Umbrich, and A. Polleres, “Open data hopes and fears: determining the barriers of open data,” in Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM, 2017, pp. 69–81.
I. Cantador, M. E. Cortés-Cediel, and M. Fernández, “Exploiting Open Data to analyze discussion and controversy in online citizen participation.,” Inf. Process. Manag., vol. 57, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102301.
S. Kubler, J. Robert, S. Neumaier, J. Umbrich, and Y. Le Traon, “Comparison of metadata quality in open data portals using the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 13–29, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.003.
J. Chen, “The Dangers of Accuracy: Exploring the Other Side of the Data Quality Principle,” Eur. Data Prot. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 36–52, 2018, doi: 10.21552/edpl/2018/1/7.
Y. Sun, B. Wang, Z. Sun, and X. Yang, “Does Every Data Instance Matter? Enhancing Sequential Recommendation by Eliminating Unreliable Data,” in The Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-21), 2021, pp. 1579–1585.
Z. Zhao et al., “RAD: On-line Anomaly Detection for Highly Unreliable Data,” 2019, doi: 10.1109/DSN.2019.00068.
M. Yi, “Exploring the quality of government open data: Comparison study of the UK, the USA and Korea,” Electron. Libr., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 35–48, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EL-06-2018-0124.
A. Quarati, “Open government data: usage trends and metadata quality,” J. Inf. Sci., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1–24, 2023, doi: 10.1177/01655515211027775.
C. Guerra-García, A. Nikiforova, S. Jiménez, and L. Perez-Gonzalez, H. G., Ramírez-Torres, M., Ontañon-García, “ISO/IEC 25012-based methodology for managing data quality requirements in the development of information systems: Towards Data Quality by Design,” Data Knowl. Eng., vol. 145, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.datak.2023.102152.
D. Williams and H. Tang, “Data quality management for industry 4.0: A survey,” Softw. Qual. Prof., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 26–35, 2020.
H. Fadlallah et al., “Context-aware big data quality assessment: a scoping review,” ACM J. Data Inf. Qual., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1–33, 2023, doi: 10.1145/3603707.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors Declaration
- The Authors certify that they have read, understood, and agreed to the Journal of Information Systems and Informatics (JournalISI) submission guidelines, policies, and submission declaration. The submission has been prepared using the provided template.
- The Authors certify that all authors have approved the publication of this manuscript and that there is no conflict of interest.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is their original work, has not received prior publication, is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and has not been previously published.
- The Authors confirm that all authors listed on the title page have contributed significantly to the work, have read the manuscript, attest to the validity and legitimacy of the data and its interpretation, and agree to its submission.
- The Authors confirm that the manuscript is not copied from or plagiarized from any other published work.
- The Authors declare that the manuscript will not be submitted for publication in any other journal or magazine until a decision is made by the journal editors.
- If the manuscript is finally accepted for publication, the Authors confirm that they will either proceed with publication immediately or withdraw the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s withdrawal policies.
- The Authors agree that, upon publication of the manuscript in this journal, they transfer copyright or assign exclusive rights to the publisher, including commercial rights
