Benchmarking Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on the Cleveland Heart Disease Binary Classification Dataset

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1794

Keywords:

Ridge Classifier, Tree based Models, BiLSTM CNN Hybrid, Class Imbalance (SMOTE), Cleveland Heart Disease Dataset

Abstract

Many high-stakes applications relied on binary classification, yet practitioners lacked equitable, methodical benchmarks that evaluated diverse model families under identical conditions. This study used the Cleveland Heart Disease tabular dataset to conduct a controlled, empirical benchmark of a regularised linear model (Ridge Classifier), tree-based ensembles (XGBoost, Random Forest), and a hybrid deep learning architecture combining Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory and Convolutional Neural Network layers (BiLSTM-CNN) on a mildly imbalanced binary classification task. A strict protocol was applied, comprising uniform pre-processing, Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) applied to training folds only, a hybrid hold-out design with internal five-fold stratified crossvalidation on the training set (70%), and evaluation using accuracy, positive-class precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC) on a fixed test set (15%). Cross-validation results showed that no single model dominated every metric: the Ridge Classifier unexpectedly achieved the best AUC (0.8945), indicating strong ranking ability; Random Forest and XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (81.67%); and the BiLSTM-CNN hybrid achieved the highest recall and F1 score (0.8478 and 0.8365, respectively). These findings indicated that, for this dataset, classical and ensemble approaches remained competitive with the more complex hybrid deep learning model, suggesting their continued relevance for similar small-scale, tabular binary classification tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. N. Edmund, I. D. Emmanuel, and E. Ebenezer, “Comparative Evaluation of BiLSTM-CNN , XGBoost , and Ridge Regression for Heart Disease Classification on the Cleveland Dataset,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3819–3851, 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i3.1668.

[2] P. H. Hutagalung, S. Informasi, and U. Nasional, “Heart Disease Classification Using Optimised XGBoost and Random Forest with SHAP Explanations,” Sink. J. dan Penelit. Tek. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–342, 2026, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v10i1.15544 e-ISSN.

[3] M. A. Kadhim and A. M. Radhi, “Heart disease classification using optimized Machine learning algorithms Heart disease classification using optimized Machine learning algorithms,” Iraqi J. Comput. Sci. Math., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 31–42, 2023, doi: 10.52866/ijcsm.2023.02.02.004.

[4] S. W. P. M. Janosi Andras and R. Detrano, “Heart Disease,” Heart Disease. [Online]. Available: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Heart+Disease

[5] T. Karadeniz, G. Tokdemir, and H. H. Maraş, “A Structure-Aware Classifier to Predict Heart Disease BT - Intelligent Systems and Pattern Recognition,” T. Ensari, A. Bennour, B. Bouaziz, I. Rida, and W. Mahdi, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 315–326.

[6] M. T. Yaqoob, A. M. Khan, A. A. Shaikh, and N. Khan, “Review on Cleveland Heart Disease Dataset using Machine Learning,” QUEST Res. J., vol. 21, no. 01, pp. 87–98, 2023.

[7] K. V. V. Reddy, I. Elamvazuthi, A. A. Aziz, S. Paramasivam, H. N. Chua, and S. Pranavanand, “Heart disease risk prediction using machine learning classifiers with attribute evaluators,” Appl. Sci., vol. 11, no. 18, Art. no. 8352, 2021.

[8] Aaryashree and A. Devi, “Integrating machine learning with electrochemical sensors for intelligent food safety monitoring,” Artif. Intell. Chem., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 100105, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.aichem.2025.100105.

[9] Y. Yang and Y. YANG, “Hybrid Prediction Method for Wind Speed Combining Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition and Bayesian Ridge Regression,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 71206–71218, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984020.

[10] N. V Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE : Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 321–357, 2002.

[11] Z. Shangli, Z. Lili, Q. I. U. Kuanmin, L. U. Ying, and C. A. I. Baigen, “Variable Selection in Logistic Regression Model ∗,” Chinese J. Electron., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 813–818, 2015, doi: 10.1049/cje.2015.10.025.

[12] N. E. Ajimah and O. N. Iloanusi, “Biometric voice recognition system in the context of multiple languages : using traditional means of identification of individuals in Nigeria languages and English language,” Res. Stat. (Taylor Fr. group, LLC), vol. 2, no. i, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.1080/27684520.2024.2362298.

[13] A. Al-hamadani, “Benchmarking the Mapping of Address and Port With Encapsulation Border Relay Routers,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, no. June, pp. 124631–124650, 2025.

[14] K. Kumar, R. Garg, and N. Goel, “Heart Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning: A Comparative Approach on CHSLB and Cleveland Datasets with Advanced Modeling Techniques BT,” in Data Science and Applications, S. J. Nanda, R. P. Yadav, M. Prasad, and M. Saraswat, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 38–50. doi: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-12827-0_3.

[15] N. E. Ajimah, A. A. Christopher, O. T. Oluwaseun, L. I. Agbotiname, and D. S. Tanko, “Artififcial Intelligence- Assisted Internet of Medical Things Enabling Medical Image Processing,” in Handbook of Security and Privacy of AI-Enabled Healthcare Systems and Internet of Medical Things, vol. 1, Routledge Publishers: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023, pp. 309–334. doi: 9781003370321.

[16] A. Kostovska, G. S. Member, D. Vermetten, C. Doerr, and S. Džeroski, “OPTION : OPTImization Algorithm Benchmarking ONtology,” IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1618–1632, 2023, doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2022.3232844.

[17] K. Panetta, L. Kezebou, and G. S. Member, “Benchmark Dataset and Underwater Image Enhancement With GAN,” IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 59–75, 2022, doi: 10.1109/JOE.2021.3086907.

[18] R. Ramm, Y. Li, A. Oberdörster, S. Heist, G. Notni, and P. Kühmstedt, “Sensor applications Benchmarking AI-Based Monocular Depth Estimators in Terms of Their Metrological Potential Following 3-D Sensor Guideline VDI / VDE 2634,” Sens. Appl., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 4–7, 2026.

[19] N. Fazakis, S. Kotsiantis, and Y. Dimakopoulos, “MAGA : A Controlled Minority-Class Generative-Augmentation Framework With Fairness-Aware Selection for Imbalanced Diabetes Tabular Classification,” IEEE Access, vol. 14, no. March 2026, 2026.

[20] S. K. Patel, S. Member, J. Surve, and G. S. Member, “Encoding and Tuning of THz Metasurface-Based Refractive Index Sensor With Behavior Prediction Using XGBoost Regressor,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 24797–24814, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3154386.

[21] M. Alzubi, M. Almseidin, and M. Alkasassbeh, “Comparative Analysis of Fuzzy Rule Interpolation Techniques Across Various Scenarios Using a Set of Benchmarks,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, no. March, pp. 33140–33153, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3371858.

[22] H. Khan, W. Ahmed, M. Z. Alam, M. Saifuddin, A. Ahmad, and S. Ahmed, “Preprocessing Techniques for Heart Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning BT - Advanced Computing Techniques in Engineering and Technology,” R. C. Bansal, V. Devedzic, R. Nayak, B. Agarwal, A. Tandon, and P. Jain, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 307–313.

[23] N. Ajimah et al., “Overview of Voice Biometric System: VoiceE Person Identification and Challenges,” in 2020 LGT-ECE-UNN International Conference- Technological Innovation for Holistic Sustainable Development (TECHISD2020), 2020.

[24] Y. Chen, S.-S. LIN, Y. SHI, T.-Y. HO, and X. XU, “MCC : Multi-Cluster Contrastive Semi-Supervised Segmentation Framework for Echocardiogram Videos,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, no. February, pp. 30543–30554, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3541173.

[25] L. I. U. Chunhui, Q. I. Yue, and D. Wenrui, “The Data-Reusing MCC-Based Algorithm and Its Performance Analysis ∗,” Chinese J. Electron., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 719–725, 2016, doi: 10.1049/cje.2016.06.019.

[26] K. Govindaraju and G. Kalimuthu, “Heart Disease Analysis and Prediction with Machine Learning Techniques Using Cleveland Dataset BT - Intelligent Computing Systems,” A. Safi, A. Martin-Gonzalez, C. Brito-Loeza, and V. Castañeda-Zeman, Eds., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025, pp. 20–43.

[27] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “XGBoost : A Scalable Tree Boosting System,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2016, pp. 785–794. doi: 10.1145/2939672.2939785.

[28] L. E. O. Breiman, “Random Forests,” Mach. Learn., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5–32, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.

[29] A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, “Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems,” Technometrics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 55–67, Feb. 1970, doi: 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
A. N. Edmund, I. D. Emmanuel, and E. Ebenezer, “Benchmarking Classical Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on the Cleveland Heart Disease Binary Classification Dataset”, journalisi, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 6402–6438, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i5.1794.