Enhancing YOLOv12-Based Rice Leaf Disease Detection through Evaluation of Three Data-Split Scenarios

Authors

  • Ida Mulyadi Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Fahrim Irhamna Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Chyquitha Danuputri Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ridwang Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ridha Awalia Muhammadiyah University of Makassar, Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i2.1580

Keywords:

Plant disease monitoring, YOLOv12, object detection, precision agriculture, rice leaf disease detection

Abstract

One of the most significant staple crops in the world is rice, and one of the main causes of the drop in agricultural yields is illnesses that affect rice leaves. To avoid large agricultural losses, early diagnosis of these illnesses is essential. The goal of this project is to use YOLOv12, the most recent deep learning-based object detection architecture, to create a rice leaf disease detection system. The model was trained using a dataset of 4,744 photos of rice leaves that included three disease classes: Leaf Blast, Brown Spot, and Bacterial Leaf Blight. Methods to boost variability and enhance detection performance, image preprocessing with data augmentation was used. Standard object detection criteria, such as mean Average Precision (mAP), precision, and recall, were used to assess the model. The YOLOv12 model was highly effective in detecting rice leaf illnesses. According to the experimental data, it achieved a mAP of 97%, a precision of 96%, and a recall of 96.5%. The use of YOLOv12's greater efficiency and quality in detecting small objects—which is essential for identifying illness symptoms on leaves—is what makes this study successful. These results lay the groundwork for upcoming precision agricultural real-time monitoring applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] C. G. Simhadri, H. K. Kondaveeti, V. K. Vatsavayi, A. Mitra, and P. Ananthachari, “Deep learning for rice leaf disease detection: A systematic literature review on emerging trends, methodologies and techniques,” Inf. Process. Agric., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 151–168, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.inpa.2024.04.006.

[2] U. I. Ismail, H. N. Chua, R. Nordin, and M. K. Ahmed, “A comprehensive review of deep learning approaches for rice disease detection: Datasets, methodologies, and future directions,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 11, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.100976.

[3] P. Pai et al., “Deep learning-based automatic diagnosis of rice leaf diseases using ensemble CNN models,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13079-z.

[4] M. H. Bijoy et al., “Towards Sustainable Agriculture: A Novel Approach for Rice Leaf Disease Detection Using dCNN and Enhanced Dataset,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 34174–34191, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3371511.

[5] J. Wang et al., “Improved Lightweight YOLOv8 Model for Rice Disease Detection in Multi-Scale Scenarios,” Agronomy, vol. 15, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.3390/agronomy15020445.

[6] T. D. Bui and T. M. Do Le, “Ghost-Attention-YOLOv8: Enhancing Rice Leaf Disease Detection with Lightweight Feature Extraction and Advanced Attention Mechanisms,” AgriEngineering, vol. 7, no. 4, 2025, doi: 10.3390/agriengineering7040093.

[7] L. E. S. C. M. 1 and odrigo O. C. C. 1, João D.S. Almeida1, Alexandre C. AraújoR1, “Detecting pancreatic masses on CT scans using YOLO architectures,” doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.077.

[8] W. Gao, C. Zong, M. Wang, H. Zhang, and Y. Fang, “Intelligent identification of rice leaf disease based on YOLO V5-EFFICIENT,” Crop Prot., vol. 183, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106758.

[9] Z. Xiuling, W. Huijuan, S. Yu, C. Gang, Z. Suhua, and Y. Quanbo, “Starting from the structure: A review of small object detection based on deep learning,” Image Vis. Comput., vol. 146, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105054.

[10] H. Deng, S. Zhang, X. Wang, T. Han, and Y. Ye, “USD-YOLO: An Enhanced YOLO Algorithm for Small Object Detection in Unmanned Systems Perception,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15073795.

[11] M. Nikouei et al., “Small object detection: A comprehensive survey on challenges, techniques and real-world applications,” Intell. Syst. with Appl., vol. 27, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200561.

[12] M. Xu, J. E. Park, J. Lee, J. Yang, and S. Yoon, “Plant disease recognition datasets in the age of deep learning: challenges and opportunities,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1452551.

[13] V. Singh, M. Pencina, A. J. Einstein, J. X. Liang, D. S. Berman, and P. Slomka, “Impact of train/test sample regimen on performance estimate stability of machine learning in cardiovascular imaging,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93651-5.

[14] B. Min, T. Kim, D. Shin, and D. Shin, “Data Augmentation Method for Plant Leaf Disease Recognition,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 3, 2023, doi: 10.3390/app13031465.

[15] A. Muhammad, Z. Salman, K. Lee, and D. Han, “Harnessing the power of diffusion models for plant disease image augmentation,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1280496.

[16] K. Antwi, K. E. Bennin, D. K. Pobi Asiedu, and B. Tekinerdogan, “On the application of image augmentation for plant disease detection: A systematic literature review,” Smart Agric. Technol., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2024.100590.

[17] A. R. Muhammad, H. P. Utomo, P. Hidayatullah, and N. Syakrani, “Early Stopping Effectiveness for YOLOv4,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2022, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.8.1.11-20.

[18] M. L. Ali and Z. Zhang, “The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 12, 2024, doi: 10.3390/computers13120336.

[19] J. Leong, J. Zhao, B. Xue, W. Gibson, and M. Zhang, “Deep learning-based seabird detection in fisheries for seabird protection,” J. R. Soc. New Zeal., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2082–2102, 2025, doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2500998.

[20] Y. Tian et al., “Development and evolution of YOLO in object detection: A survey,” Neurocomputing, vol. 669, 2026, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2025.132436.

[21] M. A. M. Alhassan and E. Yılmaz, “Evaluating YOLOv4 and YOLOv5 for Enhanced Object Detection in UAV-Based Surveillance,” Processes, vol. 13, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.3390/pr13010254.

[22] N. Ma Muriyah, J. H. Sim, and A. Yulianto, “Evaluating YOLOv5 and YOLOv8: Advancements in Human Detection,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 2999–3015, 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i4.944.

[23] E. P. Silmina, T. Hardiani, and S. L. Mahfida, “The Effect of the Number of Classes on the Values Resulting from Evaluation Metrics in the YOLOv5 Model,” Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 419–425, 2025, doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.15.2.20495.

[24] N. B. Džakula, R. Heriansyah, and F. Fadly, “Performance Evaluation of YOLOv10 and YOLOv11 on Blood Cell Object Detection Dataset,” Int. J. Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 95–103, 2025, doi: 10.58723/ijaaiml.v2i2.434.

[25] H. L. Gope, H. Fukai, F. M. Ruhad, and S. Barman, “Comparative analysis of YOLO models for green coffee bean detection and defect classification,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78598-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
I. Mulyadi, F. Irhamna, C. Danuputri, Ridwang, and R. Awalia, “Enhancing YOLOv12-Based Rice Leaf Disease Detection through Evaluation of Three Data-Split Scenarios”, journalisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2017–2039, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i2.1580.

Most read articles by the same author(s)