Comparative Quality of Services and Resource Utilization Analysis of Free5GC and Open5GS in Resource-Constrained Private 5G Networks

Authors

  • Naufal Hanan Lutfianto Telkom University, Indonesia
  • Budi Prasetya Telkom University, Indonesia
  • Vivi Monita Telkom University, Indonesia
Pages Icon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63158/journalisi.v8i2.1513

Keywords:

Free5GC, Open5GS, UERANSIM, private 5G network, open-source 5GC, QoS evaluation

Abstract

This research compares the performance of two widely used open-source 5G core (5GC) platforms, Free5GC and Open5GS, in a resource-constrained private network environment. While previous studies have mainly focused on feature comparison or large-scale deployments, performance under limited computational resources has received less attention, particularly for small-scale enterprise use cases. In this work, both platforms are integrated with UERANSIM to emulate end-to-end 5G communication and evaluated under dynamic user equipment (UE) scaling. Each 5GC instance and simulator component is allocated one CPU core and 2 GB of memory. Performance is assessed using key Quality of Service (QoS) metrics, including throughput, latency, packet loss, and resource utilization (CPU and memory), under both TCP and UDP traffic. The results show that Open5GS consistently provides better performance than Free5GC. It achieves up to 10.58 Mbps throughput compared to 9.22 Mbps and maintains lower latency around 0.72–0.73 ms, while Free5GC reaches up to 1.20 ms as the number of UEs increases. In addition, Free5GC reaches high CPU utilization earlier under increasing load. These differences are mainly related to its microservice-based architecture, which introduces additional processing overhead.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] K. Veluchamy, R. R. Pavitra A., M. Isaivani, and J. M. Guerrero, ‘Research Review on Performance Evaluation of Fifth Generation (5G) Technologies and Protocols’:, in Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics, G. Prabhakar, N. Ayyanar, and S. Rajaram, Eds, IGI Global, 2024, pp. 55–76. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2786-9.ch003.

[2] H. Holma, S. Kalyanasundaram, and V. Venkatesan, ‘5G Performance’, in 5G Technology, 1st edn, H. Holma, A. Toskala, and T. Nakamura, Eds, Wiley, 2024, pp. 239–303. doi: 10.1002/9781119816058.ch10.

[3] P. Mahadevan, H. M. Alabdeli, S. I B, I. Berejnov, D. Madrakhimova, and U. R, ‘Dual Connectivity Management in 5G Mobile Internet Infrastructures’, J. Internet Serv. Inf. Secur., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 256–270, May 2025, doi: 10.58346/JISIS.2025.I2.018.

[4] J. Navarro-Ortiz, P. Romero-Diaz, S. Sendra, P. Ameigeiras, J. J. Ramos-Munoz, and J. M. Lopez-Soler, ‘A Survey on 5G Usage Scenarios and Traffic Models’, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 905–929, 2020, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.2971781.

[5] J.-C. Chen and K. K. Ramakrishnan, ‘free5GC ’25: The 1st free5GC World Forum’, in Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Taipei Taiwan: ACM, Nov. 2025, pp. 4928–4929. doi: 10.1145/3719027.3769096.

[6] R. Zhang, Y. Lin, S. Chen, and Z. Mo, ‘A Multi-Node 5G Core Network Testbed Developed from Open5GS’, in 2023 9th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), Chengdu, China: IEEE, Dec. 2023, pp. 1038–1043. doi: 10.1109/ICCC59590.2023.10507325.

[7] G. Zu et al., ‘Demo: Real-World Integration and Evaluation of Open-Source 5G Core with Commercial RAN’, in MILCOM 2025 - 2025 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), Los Angeles, CA, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2025, pp. 881–882. doi: 10.1109/MILCOM64451.2025.11310344.

[8] T. Mukute, L. Mamushiane, A. A. Lysko, E.-R. Modroiu, T. Magedanz, and J. Mwangama, ‘Control Plane Performance Benchmarking and Feature Analysis of Popular Open-Source 5G Core Networks: OpenAirInterface, Open5GS, and free5GC’, IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 113336–113360, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3441725.

[9] R. Reddy, M. Gundall, C. Lipps, and H. D. Schotten, ‘Open Source 5G Core Network Implementations: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis’, in 2023 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom), Istanbul, Turkiye: IEEE, Jul. 2023, pp. 253–258. doi: 10.1109/BlackSeaCom58138.2023.10299755.

[10] V. T. Van, N. P. Lam, D. M. Thang, D. X. Loc, and V. T. Duc, ‘Design and Implementation of a 100Gbps FPGA-Based UPF for 5G Private Networks’, in 2025 IEEE 26th International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), Suita, Osaka, Japan: IEEE, May 2025, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/HPSR64165.2025.11038876.

[11] M. Barbosa, M. Silva, E. Cavalcanti, and K. Dias, ‘Open-Source 5G Core Platforms: A Low-Cost Solution and Performance Evaluation’, in 2025 International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN), Chiang Mai, Thailand: IEEE, Jan. 2025, pp. 99–104. doi: 10.1109/ICOIN63865.2025.10992769.

[12] T. Park, H. Lee, H. Kim, S. Han, T. Kim, and S. Pack, ‘Divide and Cache: Design and Implementation of Control Plane Framework for Private 5G’, IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1550–1560, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2023.3334875.

[13] J. P. Ferreira, V. C. Ferreira, S. L. Nogueira, J. M. Faria, and J. A. Afonso, ‘A Flexible Infrastructure-Sharing 5G Network Architecture Based on Network Slicing and Roaming’, Information, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 213, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/info15040213.

[14] P. Vanichchanunt, O. Ritruechai, N. Wuttiananchai, P. Thossaporn, L. Wuttisittikulkij, and S. Paripurana, ‘Implementation of 5G Network Slicing Using Open Source Software’, in 2024 12th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), Pattaya, Thailand: IEEE, Mar. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/iEECON60677.2024.10537902.

[15] Y. Mirajkar, S. Ravichandra, A. K. Yadav, and P. Acharjee, ‘Implementing 5G Core Network for Finding Metrics and Analyzing Network Performance Under DoS Attack’, in Data Science and Applications, vol. 1797, S. J. Nanda, R. P. Yadav, M. Prasad, and M. Saraswat, Eds, in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1797. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2026, pp. 134–143. doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-15410-1_11.

[16] B. Zivkovic and Z. Cica, ‘Multi-Connectivity Framework Based on Open-Source 5G Network Core’, in 2024 32nd Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), Belgrade, Serbia: IEEE, Nov. 2024, pp. 1–4. doi: 10.1109/TELFOR63250.2024.10819121.

[17] G. A. Santos, J. P. J. Da Costa, and A. A. S. Da Silva, ‘Towards to Beyond 5G Virtual Environment for Cybersecurity Testing in V2X Systems’, in 2023 Workshop on Communication Networks and Power Systems (WCNPS), Brasilia, Brazil: IEEE, Nov. 2023, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/WCNPS60622.2023.10344440.

[18] R. Dhuny and F. Ying, ‘Enhancing Education Accessibility: Portable Microservers for Computer-Based Testing in Resource-Constrained Environments’, in 2025 22nd International Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), jeddah, Saudi Arabia: IEEE, Jan. 2025, pp. 36–41. doi: 10.1109/LT64002.2025.10940413.

[19] S. Brown, D. Harman, C. Anderson, and M. Dwyer, ‘Characterizing Distributed Inferencing at the Edge in Resource-Constrained Environments’, in MILCOM 2023 - 2023 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM), Boston, MA, USA: IEEE, Oct. 2023, pp. 45–50. doi: 10.1109/MILCOM58377.2023.10356309.

[20] L. A. De Oliveira, A. L. De Oliveira, and E. F. Silva, ‘Evaluation of EAP Usage for Authenticating Wi-Fi Enterprise Users in 5G Networks’, in 2025 13th Wireless Days Conference (WD), Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: IEEE, Dec. 2025, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/WD67713.2025.11302618.

[21] J. Chen and Z. Tao, ‘Quantitative Analysis and Mitigation of the Impact of Network Latency on Video Conferencing Communication Efficiency’, Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 470–486, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.1177/00187208251398477.

[22] M. K. P and M. Supriya, ‘Throughput Analysis with Effect of Dimensionality Reduction on 5G Dataset using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models’, in 2022 International Conference on Industry 4.0 Technology (I4Tech), Pune, India: IEEE, Sep. 2022, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/I4Tech55392.2022.9952579.

[23] A. Morato, E. Ferrari, S. Vitturi, and F. Tramarin, ‘A TSN-Based Technique for Latency Measurement in Real-Time Wireless Communication Networks’, in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Measurements & Networking (M&N), Rome, Italy: IEEE, Jul. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/MN60932.2024.10615590.

[24] P. Wang, A. Zhang, G. Lin, and S. Wang, ‘Research on the Relationship between Resource Utilization Rate of 5GC Network Elements and Network Traffic Volume’, in 2024 9th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Signal Processing (ICSP), Xian, China: IEEE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1321–1325. doi: 10.1109/ICSP62122.2024.10743930.

[25] K. L. Devi and S. Valli, ‘Time series-based workload prediction using the statistical hybrid model for the cloud environment’, Computing, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 353–374, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00607-022-01129-7.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
N. H. Lutfianto, B. Prasetya, and V. Monita, “Comparative Quality of Services and Resource Utilization Analysis of Free5GC and Open5GS in Resource-Constrained Private 5G Networks”, journalisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2098–2116, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.63158/journalisi.v8i2.1513.